Rewinding Internationalism

From Hyphen—
Revision as of 09:19, 2 February 2026 by R Intan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Rewinding Internationalism''' is an exhibition and research project that engages with the construct of internationalism through multiple scenes. It includes four new commissions and a number of collaborative research projects, alongside loans and archival material form public and private lenders. The departure point for the project is the 1990s–a period when the construct of internationalism was in deep flux across both political and cultural contexts. Rather than...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rewinding Internationalism is an exhibition and research project that engages with the construct of internationalism through multiple scenes. It includes four new commissions and a number of collaborative research projects, alongside loans and archival material form public and private lenders. The departure point for the project is the 1990s–a period when the construct of internationalism was in deep flux across both political and cultural contexts.

Rather than represent a series of histories, however, works in the exhibition bring moments, places and people into dialogue. The dialogue across research and artworks allow evocations and implications to speak across the 1990s to the present moment, defined as it is by deepening and ongoing ecological and biopolitical crises and when the idea of internationalism is again in flux. Finally, 'Rewinding Internationalism' can be understood as an experiment in bringing histories, knowledges and subjectivities into dialogue through the form of exhibition making.

The exhibition’s title draws on writer and theorist Ariella Aisha Azoulay’s call to ‘learn to rewind’, understanding that any engagement with a specific moment in time, necessitates addressing the relationship and inter-connections with different historical moments as part of an ongoing present as well as ‘unlearning’ concepts that may have become sedimented over time, as is the case with the construct of internationalism.

It uses Azoulay’s writing as a prompt and an evocation: To address events in the past, not as over but as part of an ongoing present, a troubling of concepts such as the archive as neutral, and as means through which to question how we understand terms that we take to be descriptions of the world–such as internationalism.